Hi Tomi,

Am 29.07.2015 um 07:47 schrieb Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller <h...@goldelico.com>:

> Hi all,
> 
> Am 29.07.2015 um 05:13 schrieb Rob Herring <robherri...@gmail.com>:
> 
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Belisko Marek <marek.beli...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
>>> <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:38:34PM +0200, Marek Belisko wrote:
>>>>> Fix following:
>>>>> [    8.862274] ERROR: Bad of_node_put() on /ocp/i2c@48070000/twl@48/audio
>>>>> [    8.869293] CPU: 0 PID: 1003 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 
>>>>> 4.2.0-rc2-letux+ #1175
>>>>> [    8.876922] Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree)
>>>>> [    8.883514] [<c00159e0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0012488>] 
>>>>> (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>>>>> [    8.891693] [<c0012488>] (show_stack) from [<c05cb810>] 
>>>>> (dump_stack+0x78/0x94)
>>>>> [    8.899322] [<c05cb810>] (dump_stack) from [<c02cfd5c>] 
>>>>> (kobject_release+0x68/0x7c)
>>>>> [    8.907409] [<c02cfd5c>] (kobject_release) from [<bf0040c4>] 
>>>>> (twl4030_vibra_probe+0x74/0x188 [twl4030_vibra])
>>>>> [    8.917877] [<bf0040c4>] (twl4030_vibra_probe [twl4030_vibra]) from 
>>>>> [<c03816ac>] (platform_drv_probe+0x48/0x90)
>>>>> [    8.928497] [<c03816ac>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c037feb4>] 
>>>>> (really_probe+0xd4/0x238)
>>>>> [    8.937103] [<c037feb4>] (really_probe) from [<c0380160>] 
>>>>> (driver_probe_device+0x30/0x48)
>>>>> [    8.945678] [<c0380160>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c03801e0>] 
>>>>> (__driver_attach+0x68/0x8c)
>>>>> [    8.954589] [<c03801e0>] (__driver_attach) from [<c037ea60>] 
>>>>> (bus_for_each_dev+0x50/0x84)
>>>>> [    8.963226] [<c037ea60>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c037f828>] 
>>>>> (bus_add_driver+0xcc/0x1e4)
>>>>> [    8.971832] [<c037f828>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c0380b60>] 
>>>>> (driver_register+0x9c/0xe0)
>>>>> [    8.980255] [<c0380b60>] (driver_register) from [<c00097e0>] 
>>>>> (do_one_initcall+0x100/0x1b8)
>>>>> [    8.988983] [<c00097e0>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c00b8008>] 
>>>>> (do_init_module+0x58/0x1c0)
>>>>> [    8.997497] [<c00b8008>] (do_init_module) from [<c00b8cac>] 
>>>>> (SyS_init_module+0x54/0x64)
>>>>> [    9.005950] [<c00b8cac>] (SyS_init_module) from [<c000ed20>] 
>>>>> (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54)
>>>>> [    9.015838] input: twl4030:vibrator as 
>>>>> /devices/platform/68000000.ocp/48070000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0048/48070000.i2c:twl@48:audio/input/input2
>>>>> 
>>>>> node passed to of_find_node_by_name is put inside that function and new 
>>>>> node
>>>>> is returned if found. Free returned node not already freed node.
>>>> 
>>>> Hmm, if of_find_node_by_name() "puts" passed in node should we not "get"
>>>> it before calling of_find_node_by_name()? The node pointer in question
>>>> is simply copied from parent device.
>>> I'm not sure. what I can say is that I cannot see such error in 4.1
>>> but only in 4.2-rcx.
>>> Adding Grant and Rob to CC, maybe they know what should be done and
>>> why I see such error in 4.2-rcx.
>> 
>> The problem was that node passed into of_find_node_by_name is the the
>> starting point to search, but you should be doing the put on the
>> returned node. So the patch below is correct.
> 
> Fine!
> 
> We have a similar error on OMAP5 here:
> 
> [   11.027144] CPU: 1 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u4:0 Not tainted 4.2.0-rc4-letux+ 
> #1187
> [   11.034790] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
> [   11.041077] Workqueue: deferwq deferred_probe_work_func
> [   11.046557] [<c0015a00>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c00124a0>] 
> (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [   11.054663] [<c00124a0>] (show_stack) from [<c05cb694>] 
> (dump_stack+0x78/0x94)
> [   11.062224] [<c05cb694>] (dump_stack) from [<c02cfd5c>] 
> (kobject_release+0x68/0x7c)
> [   11.070234] [<c02cfd5c>] (kobject_release) from [<c03291d8>] 
> (omapdss_of_find_source_for_first_ep+0x58/0x74)
> [   11.080510] [<c03291d8>] (omapdss_of_find_source_for_first_ep) from 
> [<bf089290>] (hdmic_probe+0xb4/0x22c [connector_hdmi])
> [   11.092080] [<bf089290>] (hdmic_probe [connector_hdmi]) from [<c0381490>] 
> (platform_drv_probe+0x48/0x90)
> [   11.101997] [<c0381490>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c037fc98>] 
> (really_probe+0xd4/0x238)
> [   11.110556] [<c037fc98>] (really_probe) from [<c037ff44>] 
> (driver_probe_device+0x30/0x48)
> [   11.119108] [<c037ff44>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c037e7bc>] 
> (bus_for_each_drv+0x4c/0x84)
> [   11.128023] [<c037e7bc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c037fe90>] 
> (__device_attach+0x70/0xd0)
> [   11.136579] [<c037fe90>] (__device_attach) from [<c037f3f8>] 
> (bus_probe_device+0x28/0x84)
> [   11.145135] [<c037f3f8>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c037f808>] 
> (deferred_probe_work_func+0x58/0x88)
> [   11.154518] [<c037f808>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c0054ff0>] 
> (process_one_work+0x294/0x4a0)
> [   11.164083] [<c0054ff0>] (process_one_work) from [<c0055414>] 
> (worker_thread+0x1ec/0x2fc)
> [   11.172641] [<c0055414>] (worker_thread) from [<c005a3b4>] 
> (kthread+0xd4/0xe8)
> [   11.180200] [<c005a3b4>] (kthread) from [<c000edf8>] 
> (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c)
> 
> So it looks as if there are more get/put mismatches in the drivers which are 
> usually not visible.
> 
>> 
>> As far as why in 4.2, it seems you have OF_DYNAMIC enabled in your
>> config either because you have DT unit test or overlays enabled.
>> Overlays are now user enable-able in 4.2.
> 
> Further analysis turns out that we recently have enabled 
> DRM_TILCDC_SLAVE_COMPAT=y
> which we need to make our uImage additionally support the BeagleBone Black 
> with LDC panel
> (as mandated by  arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-boneblack.dts using 
> “ti,tilcdc,slave”).
> 
> This automatically enables OF_OVERLAY which enables OF_DYNAMIC.
> 
> Obviously this now has unexpected side-effects on other systems with 
> universal kernels configured
> to support both, beaglebone and non-beaglebone devices.
> 
> So what is wrong? The sequence DRM_TILCDC_SLAVE_COMPAT => set OF_OVERLAY => 
> set OF_DYNAMIC?
> 
> Or of_node_get/put() bugs in some drivers revealed by running the unit tests?
> 
> I have added Tomi to the discussion and we will try to understand/fix 
> omapdss_of_find_source_for_first_ep().

This workaround silences the ERROR but I have no explanation or fix:

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/dss/dss-of.c 
b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/dss/dss-of.c
index 928ee63..2b55a5c 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/dss/dss-of.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/dss/dss-of.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ omapdss_of_find_source_for_first_ep(struct device_node 
*node)
 
        src = omap_dss_find_output_by_port_node(src_port);
 
-       of_node_put(src_port);
+//     of_node_put(src_port);
 
        return src ? src : ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 }

> 

> BR,
> Nikolaus
> 
>> 
>> Rob
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <ma...@goldelico.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c | 3 ++-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c 
>>>>> b/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c
>>>>> index fc17b95..10c4e3d 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c
>>>>> @@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ static bool twl4030_vibra_check_coexist(struct 
>>>>> twl4030_vibra_data *pdata,
>>>>>     if (pdata && pdata->coexist)
>>>>>             return true;
>>>>> 
>>>>> -     if (of_find_node_by_name(node, "codec")) {
>>>>> +     node = of_find_node_by_name(node, "codec");
>>>>> +     if (node) {
>>>>>             of_node_put(node);
>>>>>             return true;
>>>>>     }
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Dmitry
>>> 
>>> BR,
>>> 
>>> marek
>>> 
>>> --
>>> as simple and primitive as possible
>>> -------------------------------------------------
>>> Marek Belisko - OPEN-NANDRA
>>> Freelance Developer
>>> 
>>> Ruska Nova Ves 219 | Presov, 08005 Slovak Republic
>>> Tel: +421 915 052 184
>>> skype: marekwhite
>>> twitter: #opennandra
>>> web: http://open-nandra.com
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to