On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:03:35AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > > >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, > >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_device(struct device *hwdev, > > Huh? These look identical ... same args, same code, just a > different name.
Have you looked at the implementations for swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu and swiotlb_sync_single_for_device? Those are already identical. I'm just following the existing style/practice in that file. I could do an additional patch to rectify the replication in those functions if you'd like? Who is responsible for the swiotlb code? John -- John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
