On 30 July 2015 at 10:24, Peter Maydell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30 July 2015 at 09:04, Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:23:20AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: >>> >>> Why do we drop the previous way using "QEMUXXXX"? Something I missed? >> >> So that guests that bind to this interface will work fine with non QEMU >> implementations of virtio-mmio. > > I don't understand this sentence. If there are pre-existing > non-QEMU virtio-mmio implementations, then they're using > LNRO0005, and we should use it too.
The only one I have come across is the ARM FVP model, and it happens that I chose the ID and maintain the tables for that so I can change it. Graeme -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
