On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:41:09AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 07/31/2015 10:38 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This cleans up the usage of IS_ERR(_OR_NULL)(), where the callers have
> >added additional unlikely compiler flag to them. It also fixes the
> >definition of IS_ERR_OR_NULL(), to use unlikely for all checks it does.
>
> [+CC Steven Rostedt]
>
> Any idea what the compiler does in the case of
> "if (likely(IS_ERR(...)))"? There are apparently such cases in the source.
We have two cases in code:
drivers/rtc/rtc-gemini.c: if (likely(IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev)))
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c: if
(likely(IS_ERR(shadow) && PTR_ERR(shadow) == -ENOENT)) {
The first one is mistake, I think. Or do we expect rtc_device_register()
to fail?
The second is redundant. "if (PTR_ERR(shadow) == -ENOENT)" should do the
job.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
