On 31/07/2015 12:25, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> > The reason why it isn't documented is probably hidden within Intel. >> > Besides ICEBP, which is a bit fringe, there's no reason not to document >> > SALC which Thomas mentioned. SALC all has been there since the 8086, >> > and has been undocumented for thirty-odd years. > That one is invalid (on an IVB): > > [ 1306.231408] traps: icebp[3783] trap invalid opcode ip:4004b0 > sp:7fffffffe610 error:0 in icebp[400000+1000] > > AMD APM documents it as invalid too.
It's valid in 32-bit. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
