4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> commit b86a50c3b5414eafdbee7f34af4a201a4a7817c2 upstream. Cleanup commit 73679e508201 ("compiler-intel.h: Remove duplicate definition") removed the double definition of __memory_barrier() intrinsics. However, in doing so, it also removed the preceding #undef barrier by accident, meaning, the actual barrier() macro from compiler-gcc.h with inline asm is still in place as __GNUC__ is provided. Subsequently, barrier() can never be defined as __memory_barrier() from compiler.h since it already has a definition in place and if we trust the comment in compiler-intel.h, ecc doesn't support gcc specific asm statements. I don't have an ecc at hand (unsure if that's still used in the field?) and only found this by accident during code review, a revert of that cleanup would be simplest option. Fixes: 73679e508201 ("compiler-intel.h: Remove duplicate definition") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.pr...@gmail.com> Cc: Pranith Kumar <bobby.pr...@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> Cc: mancha security <manc...@zoho.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- include/linux/compiler-intel.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- a/include/linux/compiler-intel.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler-intel.h @@ -13,10 +13,12 @@ /* Intel ECC compiler doesn't support gcc specific asm stmts. * It uses intrinsics to do the equivalent things. */ +#undef barrier #undef barrier_data #undef RELOC_HIDE #undef OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR +#define barrier() __memory_barrier() #define barrier_data(ptr) barrier() #define RELOC_HIDE(ptr, off) \ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/