4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
commit ca4da5dd1f99fe9c59f1709fb43e818b18ad20e0 upstream.
__key_link_end is not freeing the associated array edit structure
and this leads to a 512 byte memory leak each time an identical
existing key is added with add_key().
The reason the add_key() system call returns okay is that
key_create_or_update() calls __key_link_begin() before checking to see
whether it can update a key directly rather than adding/replacing - which
it turns out it can. Thus __key_link() is not called through
__key_instantiate_and_link() and __key_link_end() must cancel the edit.
CVE-2015-1333
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.mor...@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
security/keys/keyring.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/security/keys/keyring.c
+++ b/security/keys/keyring.c
@@ -1181,9 +1181,11 @@ void __key_link_end(struct key *keyring,
if (index_key->type == &key_type_keyring)
up_write(&keyring_serialise_link_sem);
- if (edit && !edit->dead_leaf) {
- key_payload_reserve(keyring,
- keyring->datalen - KEYQUOTA_LINK_BYTES);
+ if (edit) {
+ if (!edit->dead_leaf) {
+ key_payload_reserve(keyring,
+ keyring->datalen - KEYQUOTA_LINK_BYTES);
+ }
assoc_array_cancel_edit(edit);
}
up_write(&keyring->sem);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
