On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:42:41AM +0000, Kaixu Xia wrote:
> +static u64 bpf_perf_event_read(u64 r1, u64 index, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
> +{
> +     struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r1;
> +     struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
> +     struct perf_event *event;
> +
> +     if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
> +             return -E2BIG;
> +
> +     event = array->events[index];
> +     if (!event)
> +             return -EBADF;
> +
> +     if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> +             return -ENOENT;
> +
> +     if (event->oncpu != raw_smp_processor_id() &&
> +         event->ctx->task != current)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     if (event->attr.inherit)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     __perf_event_read(event);
> +
> +     return perf_event_count(event);
> +}

Please no poking of event internal state outside of perf code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to