On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:56:42PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:36:12PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > debugfs files are not necessary for the usual operation of the driver > > and the device. No need to check for the return values from the debugfs > > file creation. Even if one debugfs file fails to create we try with the > > next debugfs file and ultimately return success always so that the > > driver continues to load.
Does this even happen? I'm reluctant to merge patches without real-world justification. -Daniel > > cleanup will clean all the created debugfs files as the list of file > > that are created are maintained in minor->debugfs_list. > > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <su...@vectorindia.org> > > --- > A gentle ping. > > regards > sudip > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
