On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 15:44 +0800, yuantian.t...@freescale.com wrote:
 +static void rcpm_v1_set_ip_power(bool enable, u32 *mask)
 +{
 +     if (enable)
 +             setbits32(&rcpm_v1_regs->ippdexpcr, *mask);
 +     else
 +             clrbits32(&rcpm_v1_regs->ippdexpcr, *mask);
 +}
 +
 +static void rcpm_v2_set_ip_power(bool enable, u32 *mask)
 +{
 +     if (enable)
 +             setbits32(&rcpm_v2_regs->ippdexpcr[0], *mask);
 +     else
 +             clrbits32(&rcpm_v2_regs->ippdexpcr[0], *mask);
 +}

Why do these take "u32 *mask" instead of "u32 mask"?

-Scott

I think it can be used in the case where there are several mask values.

-Chenhui

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to