On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:45:24AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> P.P.P.S. Who thought that IRET faults unmasking NMIs made any sense
> whatsoever when NMIs run on an IST stack? Seriously, people?
What happened with asking Intel for a sane IRET-NG?
Should be relatively easy - take the current IRET microcode, get rid
of the nasty crap, allocate a new opcode and done. Validation should
actually have *less* to do and can reuse all current test cases.
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
