Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> writes:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> writes:
>> > +
>> > +  /* Some systems map "vectors" to interrupts weirdly.  Not us! */
>> > +  __this_cpu_write(vector_irq[FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + irq, irq);
>> 
>> Missing ].
>
> Doh.
>
>> [   17.751889] do_IRQ: 0.33 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
>> 
>> You broke interrupts :(
>
> Right, because I missed the other place which fiddles with
> interrupts. Does the patch below fix the issue?

Yep.  I added error handling.

I reworked it into two patches: one which staticizes lguest_setup_irq()
and moves it up, the other of which applies your changes.

Will post, you can take them...

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to