On 08/04/2015 10:09 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi Moritz, > > Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2015, 18:13 -0700 schrieb Moritz Fischer: >> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fisc...@ettus.com> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset.txt | 68 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..498c037a >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ >> +Xilinx Zynq Reset Manager >> + >> +The Zynq AP-SoC has several different resets. >> + >> +See Chapter 26 of the Zynq TRM (UG585) for more information about Zynq >> resets. >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: "xlnx,zynq-reset" >> +- reg: SLCR offset and size taken via syscon <0x200 0x48> >> +- syscon: <&slcr> >> + This should be a phandle to the Zynq's SLCR register. > > ^ register singular? > > I still think the syscon phandle property is superfluous, > but I'm fine with keeping it for consistency. > It could always be made optional later.
Great. Philipp: I expect you want to take at least 1/4 and 3/4 via your tree. I am fine if you also want to add 2/4 and 4/4 via your tree. If you think that they should go via arm-soc please let me know and I will add them to the queue. Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/