On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:13:39AM +0000, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 02:55:30AM +0000, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > 
> > One possible way to get hugetlb metric in per-task basis is to walk page
> > table via /proc/pid/pagemap, and counting page flags for each mapped page
> > (we can easily do this with tools/vm/page-types.c like "page-types -p <PID>
> > -b huge"). This is obviously slower than just storing the counter as
> > in-kernel data and just exporting it, but might be useful in some situation.

Maybe.  The current situation is a mess and I don't know the best way
out of it yet.

> BTW, currently smaps doesn't report any meaningful info for vma(VM_HUGETLB).
> I wrote the following patch, which hopefully is helpful for your purpose.
> 
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
> 
> ---
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH] smaps: fill missing fields for vma(VM_HUGETLB)
> 
> Currently smaps reports many zero fields for vma(VM_HUGETLB), which is
> inconvenient when we want to know per-task or per-vma base hugetlb usage.
> This patch enables these fields by introducing smaps_hugetlb_range().
> 
> before patch:
> 
>   Size:              20480 kB
>   Rss:                   0 kB
>   Pss:                   0 kB
>   Shared_Clean:          0 kB
>   Shared_Dirty:          0 kB
>   Private_Clean:         0 kB
>   Private_Dirty:         0 kB
>   Referenced:            0 kB
>   Anonymous:             0 kB
>   AnonHugePages:         0 kB
>   Swap:                  0 kB
>   KernelPageSize:     2048 kB
>   MMUPageSize:        2048 kB
>   Locked:                0 kB
>   VmFlags: rd wr mr mw me de ht
> 
> after patch:
> 
>   Size:              20480 kB
>   Rss:               18432 kB
>   Pss:               18432 kB
>   Shared_Clean:          0 kB
>   Shared_Dirty:          0 kB
>   Private_Clean:         0 kB
>   Private_Dirty:     18432 kB
>   Referenced:        18432 kB
>   Anonymous:         18432 kB
>   AnonHugePages:         0 kB
>   Swap:                  0 kB
>   KernelPageSize:     2048 kB
>   MMUPageSize:        2048 kB
>   Locked:                0 kB
>   VmFlags: rd wr mr mw me de ht

Nice!

> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index ca1e091881d4..c7218603306d 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -610,12 +610,39 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct seq_file *m, 
> struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>       seq_putc(m, '\n');
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> +static int smaps_hugetlb_range(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
> +                              unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> +                              struct mm_walk *walk)
> +{
> +     struct mem_size_stats *mss = walk->private;
> +     struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
> +     struct page *page = NULL;
> +
> +     if (pte_present(*pte)) {
> +             page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, *pte);
> +     } else if (is_swap_pte(*pte)) {
> +             swp_entry_t swpent = pte_to_swp_entry(*pte);
> +
> +             if (is_migration_entry(swpent))
> +                     page = migration_entry_to_page(swpent);
> +     }
> +     if (page)
> +             smaps_account(mss, page, huge_page_size(hstate_vma(vma)),
> +                           pte_young(*pte), pte_dirty(*pte));
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* HUGETLB_PAGE */
> +
>  static int show_smap(struct seq_file *m, void *v, int is_pid)
>  {
>       struct vm_area_struct *vma = v;
>       struct mem_size_stats mss;
>       struct mm_walk smaps_walk = {
>               .pmd_entry = smaps_pte_range,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> +             .hugetlb_entry = smaps_hugetlb_range,
> +#endif

Not too fond of the #ifdef.  But I won't blame you, as there already is
an example of the same and - worse - a contradicting example that
unconditionally assigns and moved the #ifdef elsewhere.

Hugetlb is the unloved stepchild with 13 years of neglect and
half-measures.  It shows.

Patch looks good to me.

Acked-by: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>

Jörn

--
Functionality is an asset, but code is a liability.
--Ted Dziuba
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to