On 2015/8/5 10:05, Wangnan (F) wrote:
Send again since llvmdev is moved to llvm-...@lists.llvm.org

On 2015/8/5 9:58, Wangnan (F) wrote:


On 2015/8/4 3:44, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On 7/31/15 3:18 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:


[SNIP]

didn't have time to look at it.
from your llvm patches looks like you've got quite experienced
with it already :)

I'll post 2 LLVM patches by replying this mail. Please have a look and
help me
send them to LLVM if you think my code is correct.

patch 1:
I don't quite understand the purpose of builtin_dwarf_cfa
returning R11. It's a special register seen inside llvm codegen
only. It doesn't have kernel meaning.


Kernel side verifier allows us to do arithmetic computation using two local variable address or local variable address and R11. Therefore, we can compute the location
of a local variable using:

  mark = &my_var_a - __builtin_frame_address(0);

If the stack allocation is fixed (if the location is never reused), the above 'mark' can be uniquely identify a local variable. That's why I'm interesting in it. However
I'm not sure whether the prerequestion is hold.

patch 2:
do we really need to hack clang?
Can you just define a function that aliases to intrinsic,
like we do for ld_abs/ld_ind ?
void bpf_store_half(void *skb, u64 off, u64 val) asm("llvm.bpf.store.half");
then no extra patches necessary.


And for this:

I tried this test function:

void bpf_store_half(void *skb, int off, int val) asm("llvm.bpf.store.half");
int func()
{
        bpf_store_half(0, 0, 0);
        return 0;
}

Compiled with:

$ clang -g -target bpf -O2 -S -c test.c

And get this:

        .text
        .globl  func
        .align  8
func:                                   # @func
# BB#0:                                 # %entry
        mov     r1, 0
        mov     r2, 0
        mov     r3, 0
        call    llvm.bpf.store.half
        mov     r0, 0
        ret

Without -S, it generate a function relocation:

$ objdump -r ./test.o

./test.o:     file format elf64-little

RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text]:
OFFSET           TYPE              VALUE
0000000000000018 UNKNOWN           llvm.bpf.store.half


It doesn't work as you suggestion. I think we still need to do something
in clang frontend, or it can only be used in '.ll'.

Thank you.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to