On 05/08/2015 15:34, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2015-08-05 15:29+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
>> On 05/08/2015 15:21, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(idx, vcpu, kvm)
>>> + if (vcpu->vcpu_id == vcpu_id) {
>>> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EXIT, vcpu);
>>> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>
>> Why not a vcpu ioctl? kvm_for_each_vcpu can become pretty expensive if
>> you have a few dozen VCPUs.
>
> Yeah, it will be slow, the only bright side is low frequency of calls.
>
> vcpu ioctl should only be issued by the vcpu thread so it would
> significantly limit use.
That's a general limitation, but you can lift it for particular ioctls.
See in particular this:
#if defined(CONFIG_S390) || defined(CONFIG_PPC) || defined(CONFIG_MIPS)
/*
* Special cases: vcpu ioctls that are asynchronous to vcpu execution,
* so vcpu_load() would break it.
*/
if (ioctl == KVM_S390_INTERRUPT || ioctl == KVM_S390_IRQ || ioctl ==
KVM_INTERRUPT)
return kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(filp, ioctl, arg);
#endif
You can add an "if (ioctl == KVM_USER_EXIT)" before.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
