On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:28:11PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> + hdmi-transmitter@71 {
> compatible = "nxp,tda998x";
> reg = <0x71>;
> + port {
> + tda998x_1_input: endpoint@0 {
> + remote-endpoint = <&hdlcd1_output>;
> + };
> +
> + tda998x_1_output: endpoint@1 {
> + remote-endpoint =
> <&hdmi1_connector_output>;
> + };
> + };
This isn't compliant with the TDA998x binding, and is very likely to
screw Jean's work on adding audio support. See emails on lakml and
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/i2c/tda998x.txt (which looks
like it needs updating to include the ports stuff.)
Also, the whole question of representing connectors in a DRM model is
yet to be established. Yes, DT should describe the hardware, but we
don't yet know _how_ to describe physical connectors with stuff
implemented on top of DRM yet, and we have nothing that makes use of
this.
Also note that ePAPR requires a reg= property if you specify a
unit-address (the bit after the @ sign) so the above is non-compliant
with ePAPR as well.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
