On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:28:11PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > + hdmi-transmitter@71 { > compatible = "nxp,tda998x"; > reg = <0x71>; > + port { > + tda998x_1_input: endpoint@0 { > + remote-endpoint = <&hdlcd1_output>; > + }; > + > + tda998x_1_output: endpoint@1 { > + remote-endpoint = > <&hdmi1_connector_output>; > + }; > + };
This isn't compliant with the TDA998x binding, and is very likely to screw Jean's work on adding audio support. See emails on lakml and Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/i2c/tda998x.txt (which looks like it needs updating to include the ports stuff.) Also, the whole question of representing connectors in a DRM model is yet to be established. Yes, DT should describe the hardware, but we don't yet know _how_ to describe physical connectors with stuff implemented on top of DRM yet, and we have nothing that makes use of this. Also note that ePAPR requires a reg= property if you specify a unit-address (the bit after the @ sign) so the above is non-compliant with ePAPR as well. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/