Hi Joonsoo,

On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 05:03:29PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Currently, when we enter the wait state due to lack of idle stream,
> we check idle_strm list without holding the lock in expanding of
> wait_event define. In this case, some one can see stale value and
> process could fall into wait state without any upcoming wakeup process.
> Although I didn't see any error related to this race, it should be fixed.

Long time ago, I wondered about lost wake-up problem and found a article.

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8144

>From then, I have thought such issue shouldn't happen if something is
wrong since then and I believe it's same issue.

Could you point out exact code sequence about the problem you mentioned?

Thanks.

> 
> To fix it, we should check idle_strm with holding the lock and
> this patch implements it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c b/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c
> index 80a62e7..837e9c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,17 @@ static struct zcomp_strm *zcomp_strm_alloc(struct zcomp 
> *comp)
>       return zstrm;
>  }
>  
> +static bool avail_idle_strm(struct zcomp_strm_multi *zs)
> +{
> +     int avail;
> +
> +     spin_lock(&zs->strm_lock);
> +     avail = !list_empty(&zs->idle_strm);
> +     spin_unlock(&zs->strm_lock);
> +
> +     return avail;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * get idle zcomp_strm or wait until other process release
>   * (zcomp_strm_release()) one for us
> @@ -97,7 +108,7 @@ static struct zcomp_strm *zcomp_strm_multi_find(struct 
> zcomp *comp)
>               /* zstrm streams limit reached, wait for idle stream */
>               if (zs->avail_strm >= zs->max_strm) {
>                       spin_unlock(&zs->strm_lock);
> -                     wait_event(zs->strm_wait, !list_empty(&zs->idle_strm));
> +                     wait_event(zs->strm_wait, avail_idle_strm(zs));
>                       continue;
>               }
>               /* allocate new zstrm stream */
> @@ -109,7 +120,7 @@ static struct zcomp_strm *zcomp_strm_multi_find(struct 
> zcomp *comp)
>                       spin_lock(&zs->strm_lock);
>                       zs->avail_strm--;
>                       spin_unlock(&zs->strm_lock);
> -                     wait_event(zs->strm_wait, !list_empty(&zs->idle_strm));
> +                     wait_event(zs->strm_wait, avail_idle_strm(zs));
>                       continue;
>               }
>               break;
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to