"Brown, Len" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>Patch tested and works fine here. You should probably make a >>note in the bugzilla so we don't get a conflicting merge >>from the ACPI folks. > > One might also consider that it would be a good idea to > send patches that break ACPI files to the ACPI maintainer > and [EMAIL PROTECTED] before sending them > to Linus...
My apologies, for bug fixes that are not complete and simply move where the bug is. My apologies also for not cc'ing you, I didn't intend to omit you but it never occurred to me. The patch was also 2 lines and obviously correct. For this round I knew you were on the CC list and deliberately included you. My goal for the reboot/halt/suspend/kexec path is to fix it so the generic code is correct and consistent. Something it hasn't been for years creating the affect that a correct bug fix in one place would break something else. Until the reboot paths are correct and consistent things will continue to break, in weird and unpredictable ways, that will keep us all hunting weird strange bugs for a long time. I think the S4 suspend case is the last code path that needs to be fixed. It is certainly the last one I am aware of. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
