On 07/30, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:57:33AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > did this lead anywhere meanwhile. > > > > Last I remember the change to orphan handling made sunxi fail, but > > I'm still hoping to get this usable at some point :-) > > To be honest, I don't know what the current status is. I haven't get > any news since that mail. > > I started to move a significant portion of our clocks to > CLK_OF_DECLARE, but not all of them are (which probably make the > situation worse for the time being). >
Sorry, I think we're still waiting for the critical clocks stuff to settle down so that Sunxi can use that instead of calling clk_prepare_enable() in init code. For now, I've put the first patch of the two into clk-next so that we can have proper orphan tracking. Hopefully we resolve critical clocks soon so that we can merge the defer part. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
