On 13-08-15, 12:32, Jonas Rabenstein wrote:
> With commit 2907ed4377d9 ("cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific
> cpufreq driver support"), the last specific Exynos-cpufreq driver
> depending on ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ was removed. As there is no
> Exynos-specific cpufreq driver depending on the code in
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c (selected by ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ),
> this file was deleted and ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ removed from Kconfig.
> After all, the rule in drivers/cpufreq/Makefile, to combine all
> specific cpufreq drivers depending on the generic code for Exynos into
> one objectfile is obsolete and can be removed.
>
> Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o from
> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile, which - if selectable - would generate an
> always empty objectfile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenst...@studium.uni-erlangen.de>
> ---
> I found this inconsistency using the undertaker and
> undertaker-checkpatch tools (https://undertaker.cs.fau.de/).
>
> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> index bbc4a9f..958be2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ) +=
> arm_big_little_dt.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500) += dbx500-cpufreq.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += arm-exynos-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ) += exynos5440-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HISI_ACPU_CPUFREQ) += hisi-acpu-cpufreq.o
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
