3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Xie XiuQi <xiexi...@huawei.com>
commit e21404dc0ac7ac971c1e36274b48bb460463f4e5 upstream.
Loading ipmi_si module while bmc is disconnected, we found the timeout
is longer than 5 secs. Actually it takes about 3 mins and 20
secs.(HZ=250)
error message as below:
Dec 12 19:08:59 linux kernel: IPMI BT: timeout in RD_WAIT [ ] 1 retries left
Dec 12 19:08:59 linux kernel: BT: write 4 bytes seq=0x01 03 18 00 01
[...]
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI BT: timeout in RD_WAIT [ ]
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: failed 2 retries, sending error response
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI: BT reset (takes 5 secs)
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI BT: flag reset [ ]
Function wait_for_msg_done() use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1) to
sleep 1 tick, so we should subtract jiffies_to_usecs(1) instead of 100
usecs from timeout.
Reported-by: Hu Shiyuan <hushiy...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexi...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
@@ -2717,7 +2717,7 @@ static int wait_for_msg_done(struct smi_
smi_result == SI_SM_CALL_WITH_TICK_DELAY) {
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
smi_result = smi_info->handlers->event(
- smi_info->si_sm, 100);
+ smi_info->si_sm, jiffies_to_usecs(1));
} else if (smi_result == SI_SM_CALL_WITHOUT_DELAY) {
smi_result = smi_info->handlers->event(
smi_info->si_sm, 0);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
