On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:50:05PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> While pmem is usable as a block device or via DAX mappings to userspace
> there are several usage scenarios that can not target pmem due to its
> lack of struct page coverage. In preparation for "hot plugging" pmem
> into the vmemmap add ZONE_DEVICE as a new zone to tag these pages
> separately from the ones that are subject to standard page allocations.
> Importantly "device memory" can be removed at will by userspace
> unbinding the driver of the device.
> 
> Having a separate zone prevents allocation and otherwise marks these
> pages that are distinct from typical uniform memory.  Device memory has
> different lifetime and performance characteristics than RAM.  However,
> since we have run out of ZONES_SHIFT bits this functionality currently
> depends on sacrificing ZONE_DMA.
> 
> arch_add_memory() is reorganized a bit in preparation for a new
> arch_add_dev_memory() api, for now there is no functional change to the
> memory hotplug code.
> 
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
> Cc: linux...@kvack.org
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig       |   13 +++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c  |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  include/linux/mmzone.h |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c    |    5 ++++-
>  mm/page_alloc.c        |    3 +++
>  5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index b3a1a5d77d92..64829b17980b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -308,6 +308,19 @@ config ZONE_DMA
>  
>         If unsure, say Y.
>  
> +config ZONE_DEVICE
> +     bool "Device memory (pmem, etc...) hotplug support" if EXPERT
> +     default !ZONE_DMA
> +     depends on !ZONE_DMA
> +     help
> +       Device memory hotplug support allows for establishing pmem,
> +       or other device driver discovered memory regions, in the
> +       memmap. This allows pfn_to_page() lookups of otherwise
> +       "device-physical" addresses which is needed for using a DAX
> +       mapping in an O_DIRECT operation, among other things.
> +
> +       If FS_DAX is enabled, then say Y.
> +
>  config SMP
>       bool "Symmetric multi-processing support"
>       ---help---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 3fba623e3ba5..94f0fa56f0ed 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -683,15 +683,8 @@ static void  update_end_of_memory_vars(u64 start, u64 
> size)
>       }
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Memory is added always to NORMAL zone. This means you will never get
> - * additional DMA/DMA32 memory.
> - */
> -int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> +static int __arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, struct zone *zone)
>  {
> -     struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> -     struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones +
> -             zone_for_memory(nid, start, size, ZONE_NORMAL);
>       unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>       unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>       int ret;
> @@ -701,11 +694,28 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
>       ret = __add_pages(nid, zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>       WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>  
> -     /* update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory */
> -     update_end_of_memory_vars(start, size);
> +     /*
> +      * Update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory, unless we added
> +      * "device memory" which should not effect max_pfn
> +      */
> +     if (!is_dev_zone(zone))
> +             update_end_of_memory_vars(start, size);

What is the rational for not updating max_pfn, max_low_pfn, ... ?

Cheers,
Jérôme
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to