On 08/17/2015 12:00 PM, Anirudha Sarangi wrote:
>> From: Peter Hurley [mailto:pe...@hurleysoftware.com]
>> On 08/17/2015 03:22 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> From: Anirudha Sarangi <anirudha.sara...@xilinx.com>
>>>
>>> The existing interrupt handling logic has followins issues.
>>> - Upon a parity error with default configuration, the control
>>>   never comes out of the ISR thereby hanging Linux.
>>> - The error handling logic around framing and parity error are buggy.
>>>   There are chances that the errors will never be captured.
>>> - The existing ISR is just too long.
>>> This patch fixes all these concerns.
>>
>> This patch is unreviewable. Please break this down into multiple patches.
>>
> Thanks. Let me give a shot. It is just breaking the single big ISR that has 
> both Rx and Tx in a single function into smaller ones.
> Not sure how I will create smaller patches, but I will try and get back.

I would start with a refactor patch that splits up the ISR but
makes no other functional changes. Then add the bug fix patches.

Regards,
Peter Hurley

ps - The email signature below is not appropriate for lkml.

> 
> This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named 
> recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, 
> privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any 
> attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to