On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<jav...@dowhile0.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> vcc5v_touch: SWITCH_REG2 {
>>> regulator-name = "vcc5v_touch";
>>> - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
>>> + regulator-state-mem {
>>> + regulator-on-in-suspend;
>>> + };
>>
>> wouldn't regulator-suspend-mem-disabled translate to
>> regulator-off-in-suspend?
>
> Correct, the downstream regulator-suspend-mem-disabled is equivalent
> to regulator-off-in-suspend in mainline.
>
>> At least looks like it according to https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/592
>>
>
> I guess you meant https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/10/162 since it was
> Chanwoo's and not Vincent's version that finally landed.
>
>>
oh, now I got that you referenced Vincent's patch just to show the
regulator-suspend-mem-disabled property description.
Sorry for the noise then but yes you are right about the translation :-)
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
