On Sul, 2005-09-04 at 09:30 -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > MS stuff. We know that 4K stacks hurt the above. Do we really want to break > working > configs just to enforce 4K stacks? How does it hurt to make 4K the default > and > allow 8K? What _might_ make sense is to make 8K a reason to taint the kernel.
The question is whether ndiswrapper can do stack switching itself. Since as I understand it the NT stack is way more than 8K. Is there anything else needed so it (and perhaps in future other 'hard cases') can handle stacks themselves. We have seperate IRQ stack handling already which should also help this. So what is needed to make it go away - specific technical items or just the persuasive effect of having to fix it ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/