On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 08:46:22PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 25 Aug 13:36 PDT 2015, Andy Gross wrote:
>
> > This patch fixes SMEM addressing issues when remote processors need to use
> > secure SMEM partitions.
> >
>
> Right, sorry for missing that remote_pid and edge_pid isn't in sync...
>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agr...@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt | 7 +++++++
> > drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c | 18
> > ++++++++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> > index f65c76d..3b60702 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> > @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ The edge is described by the following properties:
> > Definition: the identifier of the remote processor in the smd channel
> > allocation table
> >
> > +- qcom,remote-pid:
> > + Usage: required
>
> I would like to see this being optional, as this is not a property that
> matters on any of the 32-bit systems (perhaps 8084?).
I thought about that myself, and yeah I have to agree.
>
> > + Value type: <u32>
> > + Definition: the identifier for the remote processor as known by the rest
> > + of the system.
> > +
> > = SMD DEVICES
> >
> > In turn, subnodes of the "edges" represent devices tied to SMD channels on
> > that
> > @@ -68,6 +74,7 @@ The following example represents a smd node, with one
> > edge representing the
> > interrupts = <0 168 1>;
> > qcom,ipc = <&apcs 8 0>;
> > qcom,smd-edge = <15>;
> > + qcom,remote-pid = <0xffffffff>;
>
> This looks messy, so let's make the property optional and make its
> absence indicate the "global partition".
>
> >
> > rpm_requests {
> > compatible = "qcom,rpm-msm8974";
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
> [..]
> > @@ -1184,6 +1187,13 @@ static int qcom_smd_parse_edge(struct device *dev,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + key = "qcom,remote-pid";
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, key, &edge->remote_pid);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "edge missing %s property\n", key);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
>
> So I suggest you changing this to:
>
> edge->remote_pid = QCOM_SMEM_HOST_ANY;
> of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,remote-pid", &edge->remote_pid);
Agreed.
>
> > syscon_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "qcom,ipc", 0);
> > if (!syscon_np) {
> > dev_err(dev, "no qcom,ipc node\n");
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
