On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:57:00PM +0000, Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo) wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:49:26PM -0500, Xander Huff wrote:

> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
> > > index 63a1a36..09f9e62 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c

> > > -787,13 +788,42 @@ static int write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t 
> > > *buf,
> > >           einfo.addr = to;
> > >           einfo.len = 1 << this->bbt_erase_shift;
> > >           res = nand_erase_nand(mtd, &einfo, 1);
> > > -         if (res < 0)
> > > +         if (res == -EIO && einfo.state == MTD_ERASE_FAILED
> > > +             && einfo.priv == NAND_ERASE_BLOCK_ERASE_FAILED) {
> > 
> > Do you actually need that last condition? What's wrong with the first two?
> > 
> > > +                 /* This block is bad. Mark it as such and see if
> > > +                  * there's another block available in the BBT area. */
> > > +                 int block = page >>
> > > +                         (this->bbt_erase_shift - this->page_shift);
> > > +                 pr_info("nand_bbt: failed to erase block %d when writing
> > BBT\n",
> > > +                         block);
> > > +                 bbt_mark_entry(this, block, BBT_BLOCK_WORN);
> > > +
> > > +                 res = this->block_markbad(mtd, block);
> > > +                 if (res)
> > > +                         pr_warn("nand_bbt: error %d while marking block 
> > > %d
> > bad\n",
> > > +                                 res, block);
> > > +                 goto next;
> > > +         } else if (res < 0)
> > >                   goto outerr;
> 
> 
> For my knowledge , we don't directly mark this block be a bad block,
> Just like ubi layer,this block also need to further testing and verify if
> It is real bad block.right?

That's a good point...we might want some kind of separate function for a
torture test. Might look at UBI's torture_peb() for inspiration.

> > >
> > >           res = scan_write_bbt(mtd, to, len, buf,
> > >                           td->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB ? NULL :
> > >                           &buf[len]);
> > > -         if (res < 0)
> > > +         if (res == -EIO) {
> > > +                 /* This block is bad. Mark it as such and see if
> > > +                  * there's another block available in the BBT area. */
> > > +                 int block = page >>
> > > +                         (this->bbt_erase_shift - this->page_shift);
> > > +                 pr_info("nand_bbt: failed to erase block %d when writing
> > BBT\n",
> > > +                         block);
> > > +                 bbt_mark_entry(this, block, BBT_BLOCK_WORN);
> > > +
> > > +                 res = this->block_markbad(mtd, block);
> > > +                 if (res)
> > > +                         pr_warn("nand_bbt: error %d while marking block 
> > > %d
> > bad\n",
> > > +                                 res, block);
> > > +                 goto next;
> > > +         } else if (res < 0)
> > >                   goto outerr;
> > >
> > >           pr_info("Bad block table written to 0x%012llx, version 
> > > 0x%02X\n",

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to