Just call kmem_cache_zalloc() instead of calling kmem_cache_alloc().
We're just initializing most fields to 0, false and NULL later on
_anyway_, so to make the code mode readable and potentially gain
a bit of performance (completely untested claim), we should fill our
btrfs_trans_handle with zeros on allocation then just initialize
those five remaining fields (not counting the list_heads) as normal.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexande...@gmail.com>
---
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 15 +--------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index f5021fc..d874ce25 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 num_items,
unsigned int type,
goto reserve_fail;
}
again:
- h = kmem_cache_alloc(btrfs_trans_handle_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
+ h = kmem_cache_zalloc(btrfs_trans_handle_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
if (!h) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto alloc_fail;
@@ -509,22 +509,9 @@ again:
h->transid = cur_trans->transid;
h->transaction = cur_trans;
- h->blocks_used = 0;
- h->bytes_reserved = 0;
- h->chunk_bytes_reserved = 0;
h->root = root;
- h->delayed_ref_updates = 0;
h->use_count = 1;
- h->adding_csums = 0;
- h->block_rsv = NULL;
- h->orig_rsv = NULL;
- h->aborted = 0;
- h->qgroup_reserved = 0;
- h->delayed_ref_elem.seq = 0;
h->type = type;
- h->allocating_chunk = false;
- h->reloc_reserved = false;
- h->sync = false;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->qgroup_ref_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->new_bgs);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->ordered);
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
