From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:09:52 +0530
> On 08/28/2015 12:08 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:07:33 +0530
>>
>>> @@ -4641,10 +4647,12 @@ static inline void __snmp6_fill_stats64(u64
>>> *stats, void __percpu *mib,
>>> static void snmp6_fill_stats(u64 *stats, struct inet6_dev *idev, int
>>> attrtype,
>>> int bytes)
>>> {
>>> + u64 buff[IPSTATS_MIB_MAX] = {0,};
>>> +
...
> hope you wanted to know the overhead than to change the current
> patch. please let me know..
I want you to change that variable initializer to an explicit memset().
The compiler is emitting a memset() or similar _anyways_.
Not because it will have any impact at all upon performance, but because
of how it looks to people trying to read and understand the code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
