On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote: > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 48 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi > > index 33daa49..89a363c 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi > > @@ -608,5 +608,53 @@ > > status = "okay"; > > tx-only; > > }; > > + > > + st231_gp0: st231-gp0@0 { > > + compatible = "st,st231-rproc"; > > + reg = <0x40000000 0x01000000>; > > + reg-names = "carveout"; > > + resets = <&softreset STIH407_ST231_GP0_SOFTRESET>; > > Support for these co-processor reset lines does not exist upstream. So > this series as it stands won't compile.
That's true. I have the support as part of some DEBUG patches I have in my branch. Are you aware of a plan for these, or should I upstream them myself as part of this set? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
