On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 07:14:13PM +0000, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 8b864ec..0902e4d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -623,18 +623,21 @@ int get_nohz_timer_target(void)
> > int i, cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > struct sched_domain *sd;
> >
> > - if (!idle_cpu(cpu))
> > + if (!idle_cpu(cpu) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu))
> > return cpu;
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> > for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
> > - if (!idle_cpu(i)) {
> > + if (!idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu)) {
>
> Hi, Frederic, sorry for a naive question. Per my understanding, the
> tick_nohz_full_mask is added to cpu_isolated_map in
> sched_init_smp(), and the cpu_isolated_map is excluded from sched_domain in
> init_sched_domains(), so why check here?
Very good observation! But it's better to keep this check in the domain loop in
case things change in the future such as removing that cpu_isolated_map
inclusion
or other suprises.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
