On 07/20, Andy Gross wrote:
> This patch creates a platform driver for the SCM so that we can adequately
> manage resources. This removes clients having to carry the necessary
> clocks to use the SCM resources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agr...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
It would be nice if we could use this platform device for doing
the DMAish memory allocations that we do in this driver too. I
guess one complication there is that we would need to allocate
memory with the DMA APIs before CPUs are brought up
(early_initcall level).
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> index 45c008d..5dd0514 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> @@ -15,14 +15,57 @@
> * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
> * 02110-1301, USA.
> */
> -
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
This include is here twice.
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/qcom_scm.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>
[...]
> +
> +/**
> + * qcom_scm_is_available() - Checks if SCM is available
> + */
> +bool qcom_scm_is_available(void)
> +{
> + return !!__scm;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available);
> +
> +static int qcom_scm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + __scm = NULL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Maybe we just shouldn't allow this? The firmware isn't going
anywhere at runtime, and this driver is currently marked as
bool in the Kconfig.
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_dt_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "qcom,scm",},
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_scm_dt_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver qcom_scm_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "scm",
Maybe 'qcom_scm' ?
> + .of_match_table = qcom_scm_dt_match,
> + },
> + .probe = qcom_scm_probe,
> + .remove = qcom_scm_remove,
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(qcom_scm_driver);
Isn't there some sort of builtin_platform_driver() macro for
builtin modules?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
