On 22/08/2015 00:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE is important in order to achieve good performance
> (up to 2x, though more realistically +30-40%) in latency-bound workloads.
> However, it was removed by mistake together with VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH.
> 
> It will be restored in the next revision of the virtio 1.0 standard, so
> do the same in Linux.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index d4d05f064d39..ea2c17c66dfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -478,8 +478,7 @@ static int virtblk_get_cache_mode(struct virtio_device 
> *vdev)
>                                  struct virtio_blk_config, wce,
>                                  &writeback);
>       if (err)
> -             writeback = virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE) ||
> -                         virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
> +             writeback = virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE);
>  
>       return writeback;
>  }
> @@ -840,7 +839,7 @@ static unsigned int features_legacy[] = {
>  static unsigned int features[] = {
>       VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY,
>       VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE,
> -     VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY,
> +     VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE,
>       VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
>  };
>  
> 

Ping?

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to