On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:03:23 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> > wrote: > > > > I have been applying that patch I sent to you to -next for some time. > > I guess I expected Andrew to pick it up when he rebased his patch > > series before submitting it to you. These things sometimes slip > > through the cracks. > > I suspect Andrew saw that patch, and thought it was a merge fixup like > you sometimes send out, and didn't realize that it actually applied > directly to his series. I've had it all the time, as a post-linux-next fixup - the idea being that I send it to you after its linux-next preconditions have been merged up. However I failed to put that patch inside the stephen-take-these-bits markers, so it never went from -mm into -next. New syscalls are rather a pain, both from the patch-monkeying POV and also because nobody knows what the syscall numbers will be until everything lands in mainline. Oh well, it doesn't happen often and it's easy stuff. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
