On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 06:35:24PM +0900, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Byungchul Park <[email protected]>
> 
> i found do_timer accounts other than one tick, so i made
> update_cpu_load_active care that.
> 
> is it intended because of its overhead?

I think the idea was that the NO_HZ bits would deal with the other
cases.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to