Em Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:32:47PM -0400, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
> 
> The group read results from cycles/ref-cycles/TSC/ASTATE/MSTATE event
> can be used to calculate the frequency, CPU Utilization and percent
> performance during each sampling period.
> This patch shows them in report -D.
> 
> Here is an example:
> 
> $ perf record --freq-perf  ~/tchain_edit
> 
> Here is one sample from perf report -D
> 
> 1972044565107 0x3498 [0x88]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x2): 10608/10608:
> 0x4005fd period: 564686 addr: 0
> ... sample_read:
> .... group nr 5
> ..... id 0000000000000012, value 0000000002143901
> ..... id 0000000000000052, value 0000000002143896
> ..... id 0000000000000094, value 00000000021e443d
> ..... id 00000000000000d4, value 00000000021db984
> ..... id 0000000000000114, value 00000000021db964
> ..... Freq 2301 MHz
> ..... CPU% 98%
> ..... CORE_BUSY% 99%
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/session.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>  tools/perf/util/session.h | 54 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> index 23fed17..ba763f7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
>  #include <sys/mman.h>
>  
>  #include "evlist.h"
> -#include "evsel.h"
>  #include "session.h"
>  #include "tool.h"
>  #include "sort.h"
> @@ -878,8 +877,15 @@ static void perf_evlist__print_tstamp(struct perf_evlist 
> *evlist,
>               printf("%" PRIu64 " ", sample->time);
>  }
>  
> -static void sample_read__printf(struct perf_sample *sample, u64 read_format)
> +static void sample_read__printf(struct perf_sample *sample,
> +                             struct perf_evsel *evsel)

Hey, this is a _printf_ function, i.e. one thinks about functions with
such name it doing just that, printing whatever is _already_ in the data
structures, at maximum messing with _output_ related internal state.

This probably needs setting up at some other place, so that when it
comes here it is already all worked out.

- Arnaldo

>  {
> +     u64 read_format = evsel->attr.read_format;
> +     struct perf_evlist *evlist = evsel->evlist;
> +     struct perf_sample_id *sid;
> +     perf_freq_t data = { 0 };
> +     u64 cpu_max_freq = evlist->env->cpuattr.max_freq;
> +
>       printf("... sample_read:\n");
>  
>       if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED)
> @@ -902,10 +908,26 @@ static void sample_read__printf(struct perf_sample 
> *sample, u64 read_format)
>                       printf("..... id %016" PRIx64
>                              ", value %016" PRIx64 "\n",
>                              value->id, value->value);
> +
> +                     sid = perf_evlist__id2sid(evlist, value->id);
> +                     evsel = sid->evsel;
> +                     if (evsel != NULL)
> +                             perf_freq__init(evlist->env->msr_pmu_type,
> +                                             evsel, data, value->value);
>               }
>       } else
>               printf("..... id %016" PRIx64 ", value %016" PRIx64 "\n",
>                       sample->read.one.id, sample->read.one.value);
> +
> +     if (perf_freq__has_freq(data))
> +             printf("..... Freq %lu MHz\n",
> +                    perf_freq__get_freq(data, cpu_max_freq/1000));
> +     if (perf_freq__has_cpu_util(data))
> +             printf("..... CPU%% %lu%%\n",
> +                    perf_freq__get_cpu_util(data));
> +     if (perf_freq__has_core_busy(data))
> +             printf("..... CORE_BUSY%% %lu%%\n",
> +                    perf_freq__get_core_busy(data));
>  }
>  
>  static void dump_event(struct perf_evlist *evlist, union perf_event *event,
> @@ -965,7 +987,7 @@ static void dump_sample(struct perf_evsel *evsel, union 
> perf_event *event,
>               printf("... transaction: %" PRIx64 "\n", sample->transaction);
>  
>       if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_READ)
> -             sample_read__printf(sample, evsel->attr.read_format);
> +             sample_read__printf(sample, evsel);
>  }
>  
>  static struct machine *machines__find_for_cpumode(struct machines *machines,
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.h b/tools/perf/util/session.h
> index 3915be7..83bf4a9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include "ordered-events.h"
>  #include <linux/rbtree.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include "evsel.h"
>  
>  struct ip_callchain;
>  struct thread;
> @@ -42,6 +43,10 @@ struct perf_session {
>  #define PRINT_IP_OPT_ONELINE (1<<4)
>  #define PRINT_IP_OPT_SRCLINE (1<<5)
>  
> +#define PERF_MSR_TSC         0
> +#define PERF_MSR_APERF               1
> +#define PERF_MSR_MPERF               2
> +
>  enum perf_freq_perf_index {
>       FREQ_PERF_TSC           = 0,
>       FREQ_PERF_APERF         = 1,
> @@ -52,6 +57,55 @@ enum perf_freq_perf_index {
>       FREQ_PERF_MAX
>  };
>  
> +typedef u64 perf_freq_t[FREQ_PERF_MAX];
> +
> +static inline void perf_freq__init(unsigned int msr_pmu_type,
> +                         struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> +                         perf_freq_t array,
> +                         u64 value)
> +{
> +     if (evsel->attr.type == msr_pmu_type) {
> +             if (evsel->attr.config == PERF_MSR_TSC)
> +                     array[FREQ_PERF_TSC] = value;
> +             if (evsel->attr.config == PERF_MSR_APERF)
> +                     array[FREQ_PERF_APERF] = value;
> +             if (evsel->attr.config == PERF_MSR_MPERF)
> +                     array[FREQ_PERF_MPERF] = value;
> +     }
> +     if (evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) {
> +             if (evsel->attr.config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES)
> +                     array[FREQ_PERF_CYCLES] = value;
> +             if (evsel->attr.config == PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES)
> +                     array[FREQ_PERF_REF_CYCLES] = value;
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool perf_freq__has_freq(perf_freq_t array)
> +{
> +     return ((array[FREQ_PERF_CYCLES] > 0) && (array[FREQ_PERF_REF_CYCLES] > 
> 0));
> +}
> +static inline u64 perf_freq__get_freq(perf_freq_t array, u64 cpu_max_freq)
> +{
> +     return ((array[FREQ_PERF_CYCLES] * cpu_max_freq) / 
> array[FREQ_PERF_REF_CYCLES]);
> +}
> +static inline bool perf_freq__has_cpu_util(perf_freq_t array)
> +{
> +     return ((array[FREQ_PERF_TSC] > 0) && (array[FREQ_PERF_REF_CYCLES] > 
> 0));
> +}
> +static inline u64 perf_freq__get_cpu_util(perf_freq_t array)
> +{
> +     return ((100 * array[FREQ_PERF_REF_CYCLES]) / array[FREQ_PERF_TSC]);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool perf_freq__has_core_busy(perf_freq_t array)
> +{
> +     return ((array[FREQ_PERF_APERF] > 0) && (array[FREQ_PERF_MPERF] > 0));
> +}
> +static inline u64 perf_freq__get_core_busy(perf_freq_t array)
> +{
> +     return ((100 * array[FREQ_PERF_APERF]) / array[FREQ_PERF_MPERF]);
> +}
> +
>  struct perf_tool;
>  
>  struct perf_session *perf_session__new(struct perf_data_file *file,
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to