On Thursday 08 September 2005 18:38, Tom Rini wrote: > This adds a call to notify_die() in the "no context" portion of > do_page_fault() as someone on the chain might care and want to do a fixup. > > --- > > linux-2.6.13-trini/arch/x86_64/mm/fault.c | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff -puN arch/x86_64/mm/fault.c~x86_64-no_context_hook > arch/x86_64/mm/fault.c --- > linux-2.6.13/arch/x86_64/mm/fault.c~x86_64-no_context_hook 2005-09-01 > 12:00:43.000000000 -0700 +++ > linux-2.6.13-trini/arch/x86_64/mm/fault.c 2005-09-01 12:00:43.000000000 > -0700 @@ -514,6 +514,10 @@ no_context: > if (is_errata93(regs, address)) > return; > > + if (notify_die(DIE_PAGE_FAULT, "no context", regs, error_code, 14, > + SIGSEGV) == NOTIFY_STOP) > + return; > +
But how would the chain users distingush this from the DIE_PAGE_FAULT reported at the beginning of the page fault handler? I don't see how it can work. If anything you would need a DIE_NO_CONTEXT or somesuch, no? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
