Hi Gustavo,

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:14:28 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> 
wrote:
>
> I applied the patches that Andrew has had in his post merge series
> (but I think you were sent a rolled up version):

Actually it was sent by Alexander to Marcel:

From: Alexander Aring <alex.ar...@gmail.com>
To: mar...@holtmann.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Alexander Aring <alex.ar...@gmail.com>,
        Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH bluetooth-next] drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c: 
seq_printf() now returns NULL
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:23:30 +0200
Message-Id: <1441963410-24844-1-git-send-email-alex.ar...@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.1

From: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>

I will shortly be sending
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fs-seq_file-convert-int-seq_vprint-seq_printf-etc-returns-to-void.patch
to Linus.  This will cause the linux-next version of
drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c to break at compilation time.

Below is the fix.  I suggest you apply this immediately.

Otherwise I'll try to remember to send this in after Alexander's
890acf8330cac is merged.  But there will be a window during which the
build fails, and we'll get emails...

From: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c: seq_printf() now returns NULL

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.ar...@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.ar...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 35 ++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c 
b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
index b8b0628..9756e64 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
@@ -1645,32 +1645,17 @@ static struct dentry *at86rf230_debugfs_root;
 static int at86rf230_stats_show(struct seq_file *file, void *offset)
 {
        struct at86rf230_local *lp = file->private;
-       int ret;
-
-       ret = seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS:\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.success);
-       if (ret < 0)
-               return ret;
-
-       ret = seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS_DATA_PENDING:\t%8llu\n",
-                        lp->trac.success_data_pending);
-       if (ret < 0)
-               return ret;
-
-       ret = seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS_WAIT_FOR_ACK:\t%8llu\n",
-                        lp->trac.success_wait_for_ack);
-       if (ret < 0)
-               return ret;
-
-       ret = seq_printf(file, "CHANNEL_ACCESS_FAILURE:\t%8llu\n",
-                        lp->trac.channel_access_failure);
-       if (ret < 0)
-               return ret;
 
-       ret = seq_printf(file, "NO_ACK:\t\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.no_ack);
-       if (ret < 0)
-               return ret;
-
-       return seq_printf(file, "INVALID:\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.invalid);
+       seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS:\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.success);
+       seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS_DATA_PENDING:\t%8llu\n",
+                  lp->trac.success_data_pending);
+       seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS_WAIT_FOR_ACK:\t%8llu\n",
+                  lp->trac.success_wait_for_ack);
+       seq_printf(file, "CHANNEL_ACCESS_FAILURE:\t%8llu\n",
+                  lp->trac.channel_access_failure);
+       seq_printf(file, "NO_ACK:\t\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.no_ack);
+       seq_printf(file, "INVALID:\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.invalid);
+       return 0;
 }
 
 static int at86rf230_stats_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-- 
2.5.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to