On 2015/9/11 21:03, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 08:20:54PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
I have tested patch 1 to 10. They looks good to me except patch 4/13. Please
Ok, I'll take that as a Tested-by: you for 1-10 with 4/13 having the
checks added, ok?
Sure.
Tested-by: Wang Nan <wangn...@huawei.com> // for patch 1-10 except 4
see my email in that thread.
I add those checks.
However, during the testing I found a limitation related to cpu
online/offline and 'perf top' that, if I offline most of cores before
'perf top', then online them during 'perf top' running, 'perf top'
dooesn't report new CPUs. It still reports the CPUs which are online
<SNIP>
However, It is relatively a rare case. I don't think we have to fix it
in this patchset.
Yup, unrelated to this patchset. But we need to seamlessly support that
situation, even telling the user that a CPU went offline/online.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
