On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:35:04AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > /me goes back to ignoring LLVM for the time being.
> The issue was reported as LLVM PR #9457 [1] and the bug-history [2] says... > > Reported: 2011-03-11 07:27 CST by PaX Team > > ...so it is a known and old issue. > Beyond "fixing" or implementing missing (GCC) features on the > LLVM-Clang-side... > People there have some discussion and ideas on a "workaround" or fix > it on the Linux-kernel-side. Barring LLVM implementing the relevant function call attributes, you could look at either generating the required thunks (as mentioned earlier as a work-around) or at the very least validating that all required thunks are present. > I invite you to join the discussion at LLVMLinux... > As I know... "YES, you can." Linux x86/x86_64 (assembler) Kung-Fu. > ( I admit I have not these skillz. ) Its a matter of time for me; I simply do not have enough time as it is so I have to make choices. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
