>> v@p >> ( >> *< 0 >> | >> *<= 0 >> ) > > It does not, and is not intended to, work. The branches of a disjunction > should be complete expressions.
Will the following SmPL approach be more appropriate then? ( *v@p < 0 | *v@p <= 0 ) Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
