On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:24:15PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Paul.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:38:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Well, the decision as to what is too big for -stable is owned by the
> > -stable maintainers, not by me.
>
> Is it tho? Usually the subsystem maintainer knows the best and has
> most say in it. I was mostly curious whether you'd think that the
> changes would be too risky. If not, great.
I do hope that they would listen to what I thought about it, but at
the end of the day, it is the -stable maintainers who pull a given
patch, or don't.
> > I am suggesting trying the options and seeing what works best, then
> > working to convince people as needed.
>
> Yeah, sure thing. Let's wait for Christian.
Indeed. Is there enough benefit to risk jamming this thing into 4.3?
I believe that 4.4 should be a no-brainer.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
