On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:57:46PM -0800, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:43:01PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:54:51PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > inflate: mark some arrays as INITDATA and define it in in-core callers > > > > This breaks ARM. Our decompressor has some rather odd requirements > > due to the way we support PIC - it's PIC text with fixed data. > > > > This means that all fixed initialised data must be "const" or initialised > > by code. This patch breaks that assertion. > > It would have been helpful if you quoted the patch.
That's what threading is for. 8) > +#ifndef INITDATA > +#define INITDATA > +#endif > ... > -static const u16 cplens[] = { > +static INITDATA u16 cplens[] = { > 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 23, 27, 31, > 35, 43, 51, 59, 67, 83, 99, 115, 131, 163, 195, 227, 258, 0, 0 > }; > > etc.. > > I think for ARM, we can simply do -DINITDATA=const, yes? No, unless you want to make this const: -static u8 window[0x8000]; /* use a statically allocated window */ +static u8 INITDATA window[0x8000]; /* use a statically allocated window */ It shouldn't be marked INITDATA either anyway - it's uninitialised so it'll end up in the BSS. There is no "discarded at runtime" BSS so anything you want to place in a non-BSS section has to be initialised. Of course, if you initialise it, you end up needlessly adding 32K to the kernel image size... -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core