Why not the second one?
None of the line edited in first patch haven't changed after that.

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 03:04:58PM +0530, Ronit Halder wrote:
>> This patch fixes the warning generated by sparse
>> "Using plain integer as NULL pointer" by using NULL
>> instead of zero.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ronit halder <ronit....@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> v2: added a new patch in this patch series to fix the NULL comparison style
>
> This patch, and the second one, do not apply to my tree anymore :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to