Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>> You mean that we should drop "select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION",
>> but we can't do that because an indirect call through sys_ipc() would
>> still need it when dispatching to sys_{sem,shm,msg}ctl()?
>
> Yes. But all architectures that currently use both sys_ipc and
> ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION would benefit from decoupling it when they
> add the direct syscalls.
Do we currently have architectures that use both sys_ipc and the direct
syscalls, where keeping ipc_parse_version() in the direct syscalls is required?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
