On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:05:57PM +0200, Jerome Marchand wrote: > Since commit <6539cc05386> (mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()), > the order to pass to mem_cgroup_oom() is calculated by passing the number > of pages to get_order() instead of the expected size in bytes. AFAICT, > it only affects the value displayed in the oom warning message. > This patch fix this. > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Thanks, Jerome. One minor thing: > @@ -2032,7 +2032,8 @@ retry: > > mem_cgroup_events(mem_over_limit, MEMCG_OOM, 1); > > - mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(nr_pages)); > + mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, > + get_order(nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE)); fls(nr_pages)? get_order() is basically fls(x / PAGE_SIZE). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
