On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 02:09:55 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 03:31:41 PM Pengyu Ma wrote: > > iosf_mbi is supported on Quark, Braswell, Baytrail and some Atom > > SoC, but RAPL is not limited to these SoC, it supports almost Intel > > CPUs. Remove this dependece to make RAPL support more Intel CPUs. > > > > Please select IOSF_MBI on Atom SoCs. > > Unlike Quark, I don't think we want to or do differentiate Atom from other x86 at compile time. IOSF driver can be compiled as a module also, therefore RAPL driver needs this explicit dependency at compile time. > > Signed-off-by: Pengyu Ma <pengyu...@windriver.com> > > Jacob? > > > --- > > drivers/powercap/Kconfig | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/Kconfig b/drivers/powercap/Kconfig > > index 85727ef..a7c81b5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/powercap/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/powercap/Kconfig > > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ if POWERCAP > > # Client driver configurations go here. > > config INTEL_RAPL > > tristate "Intel RAPL Support" > > - depends on X86 && IOSF_MBI > > + depends on X86 > > default n > > ---help--- > > This enables support for the Intel Running Average Power > > Limit (RAPL) > > > [Jacob Pan] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
