Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What I said is :
> 
> In @head you already have the correct nulls value, from hash table.
> 
> You do not need to recompute this value, and/or test if hash table chain
> is empty.
> 
> If hash bucket is empty, it contains the appropriate NULLS value.
> 
> If you are paranoiac add this debugging check :
> 
> if (rht_is_a_nulls(head))
>    BUG_ON(head != (struct rhash_head *)rht_marker(ht, new_hash));
> 
> 
> Therefore, simply fix the bug and unnecessary code with :

Ack.  I remember seeing this when I was working on it but never
got around to removing this bogosity.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to