On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:39:44AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Here are my improvements; hope that helps ...
Yes, looks good, thanks!--b.
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
> diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c
> index 9b76fc0..21af9a0 100644
> --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c
> +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c
> @@ -351,26 +351,26 @@ richacl_propagate_everyone(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
> struct richace *ace;
> unsigned int owner_allow, group_allow;
>
> - /*
> - * If the owner mask contains permissions which are not in the group
> - * mask, the group mask contains permissions which are not in the other
> - * mask, or the owner class contains permissions which are not in the
> - * other mask, we may need to propagate permissions up from the
> - * everyone@ allow ace. The third condition is implied by the first
> - * two.
> - */
> - if (!((acl->a_owner_mask & ~acl->a_group_mask) ||
> - (acl->a_group_mask & ~acl->a_other_mask)))
> - return 0;
> if (!acl->a_count)
> return 0;
> ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1;
> if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || !richace_is_everyone(ace))
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Permissions the owner and group class are granted through the
> + * trailing everyone@ allow ace.
> + */
> owner_allow = ace->e_mask & acl->a_owner_mask;
> group_allow = ace->e_mask & acl->a_group_mask;
>
> + /*
> + * If the group or other masks hide permissions which the owner should
> + * be allowed, we need to propagate those permissions up. Otherwise,
> + * those permissions may be lost when applying the other mask to the
> + * trailing everyone@ allow ace, or when isolating the group class from
> + * the other class through additional deny aces.
> + */
> if (owner_allow & ~(acl->a_group_mask & acl->a_other_mask)) {
> /* Propagate everyone@ permissions through to owner@. */
> who.e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID;
> @@ -379,6 +379,11 @@ richacl_propagate_everyone(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
> acl = alloc->acl;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If the other mask hides permissions which the group class should be
> + * allowed, we need to propagate those permissions up to the owning
> + * group and to all other members in the group class.
> + */
> if (group_allow & ~acl->a_other_mask) {
> int n;
>
> @@ -399,16 +404,15 @@ richacl_propagate_everyone(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
> richace_is_owner(ace) ||
> richace_is_group(ace))
> continue;
> - if (richace_is_allow(ace) || richace_is_deny(ace)) {
> - /*
> - * Any inserted entry will end up below the
> - * current entry
> - */
> - if (__richacl_propagate_everyone(alloc, ace,
> - group_allow))
> - return -1;
> - acl = alloc->acl;
> - }
> +
> + /*
> + * Any inserted entry will end up below the current
> + * entry.
> + */
> + if (__richacl_propagate_everyone(alloc, ace,
> + group_allow))
> + return -1;
> + acl = alloc->acl;
> }
> }
> return 0;
> --
> 2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
